If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
08.06.2025 01:12

Fraud
HIPAA violations
Threats of violence
Trade secrets
Revealing classified information
Insider trading
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Perjury
Why don't men find fat women attractive?
Insurrection
Conspiracy
Revenge porn
Hell Is Us' Intriguingly Bold Design Decisions Refuse To Give You A Hint - GameSpot
False advertising
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Terroristic threats
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
Child pornography
And much, much more.
No freedom is absolute.